- Digital Daily blogger John Paczkowski picks up on an interesting Apple (AAPL) factoid: Its 2Q retail store revenue soared 73% from a year ago to $2.6B. To put that in perspective, AAPL’s store revenue was greater than the company’s total quarterly revenue from 2Q of fiscal 1996 through 4Q of fiscal 2004. IPad is the catalyst.
- “By showing it’s smart enough to swallow its pride and get rid of bad ideas, like Wave and the Nexus One store, Google is showing us it’s probably smart enough to come up with some really successful ideas, too,” Dan Frommer writes at SAI.
- “It’s an uncomfortable moment for a Google fanboy,” Jeff Jarvis says. The company is getting so big it’s becoming unwieldy, as a string of recently launched products, which all failed, shows. “All of these are just early warning signs. It’s good…to see these cracks because, used properly, they are lessons that help a company get back on its track.”
- Warren Buffett rounding up 40 of America’s richest families or individuals and having them donate at least half their fortunes to charity is certainly an admirable act. “But I’m also appalled at what this reveals about how much money is now concentrated in so few hands,” former labor secretary Robert Reich says, especially as 15 million Americans are still out of work and median hourly wages keep dropping. “Most Americans don’t need charity. They need good jobs.”
- Initial jobless claims jump 19,000 to 479,000, their highest level since early April. No wonder Treasurys rallied today, while stocks fell. “Until the economic data signals a change in the trend, yields will inch lower, fears of deflation will continue to bubble,” notes James Picerno. “And the crowd will be increasingly open to arguments that the ‘new normal’ has legs.”
- “In a deflationary environment, unemployment is a coincident indicator, not a lagging one,” Josh Brown writes at The Reformed Broker, while pointing to data from 1970 to 1982 as proof. “Unemployment began to rise as the economy slowed down and peaked at the nadir of economic activity. The deflationary recessions of that period are more apropos to what we’re experiencing now than anything post 1990. No jobs = no soup for you.”
- The expected return of “quantitative easing” measures from the Fed won’t fix the economy’s actual problems, portfolio strategist Marshall Auerback writes at naked capitalism. “The Fed’s fixation on credit growth is curiously perverse, given the high prevailing levels of private debt.”
- BLS readings on private nonfarm payrolls during 1H have been notably higher than ADP monthly data. “Most likely the correct number is somewhere between ADP’s number which does not factor in new business creation, and the BLS number which I believe hugely overstates it,” says Michael Shedlock.
- The debate about unemployment largely centers around whether the jobless problem is cyclical, meaning more government action can improve the situation, or structural, where there’s not much the government can do. “We don’t know the exact structural-cyclical breakdown, but the cyclical problem is certainly larger than any imaginable Congressional response,” writes Mark Thoma. “So the excuse for inaction based upon the ‘it’s all structural’ claim isn’t persuasive.”
- Mark Cuban chronicles his failed chase of the Texas Rangers.
