- If Google (GOOG) can grow revenue, why can’t Yahoo (YHOO)? That’s the question Eric Savitz poses at Barron’s Tech Trader Daily blog. “[Yahoo CEO Carol] Bartz inspires confidence, she’s big on taking decisive action, but for all her efforts, the company still isn’t growing,” he says. “At some point, Yahoo is going to need a more clearly defined growth strategy — and it will have to execute on it.” Yahoo shares drop 8.5%.
- Google issues a 20-page response to FTC’s staff discussion draft about the future of journalism in the digital age. Main takeaway: Don’t blame Google for the newspaper industry’s troubles. “The large profit margins newspapers enjoyed in the past were built on an artificial scarcity: Limited choice for advertisers as well as readers,” Google says. (Hat tip, Jeff Jarvis.)
- Any worries that the iPad would hurt Mac sales were put to bed in Apple’s (AAPL) 3Q results. Apple set a quarterly record by selling 3.47M Macs in 3Q, a 33% increase from a year ago. “If the iPad is having any effect on Mac sales, it’s an additive one,” Digital Daily blogger John Paczkowski says. “Like the iPod once did, the new slate from Apple seems to be having a halo effect on Mac sales thanks to the publicity and Apple Store floor traffic it has generated.”
- Just how impressive were Apple’s quarterly results? Look no further than the 3.27M iPads sold during 3Q, TechCrunch says. Put into context, that’s only 200,000 fewer units than all the Macs sold. And 3Q was the best Mac sales quarter ever. “In other words, in just about any other quarter, the iPad would have outsold the Mac,” TechCrunch says, while expecting the iPad to blow past Mac sales next quarter.
- Bulls once again get rejected trying to rally S&P 500 significantly above its 50-day moving average. Bespoke Investment Group reports this is the fourth separate time since the “flash crash” in early May that the index has turned back at its 50-day moving average. “Bulls had been hoping that strong earnings would be the catalyst to take the S&P 500 to the other side of its 50-day, but so far the bears (and Bernanke) are having none of it.”
- Yesterday’s trading showed “the high-frequency-trading nerds were in full swing, but to the upside this time,” Doug Kass writes. “I have written that few complain when the algorithms take the market up (like yesterday). But I would prefer to be intellectually honest, even when the programs take the market up, and I will not stop writing about this subject until the SEC acts responsibly and curbs certain high-frequency-trading strategies.”
- The housing market is stumbling, once again. “In major markets across the country, home sales are deteriorating, inventories of unsold homes are piling up and builders are scaling back construction plans,” WSJ says.
- “Returning to a sensible, fundamentals-based housing market is painful, but ultimately, it’s something we’re going to have to do, one way or another,” Barbara Kiviat writes at Time’s Curious Capitalist blog.
- A stumbling housing market offers clear evidence that the housing tax credit was a “clear and unequivocal failure,” Bill McBride writes at Calculated Risk. “Not only did most of the benefit go to people who were going to buy anyway, but the credit didn’t reduce the overall supply,” he says. Ultimately, the tax credit merely pulled demand forward. “This is a textbook example of bad policy.”
- “At just 12 times prospective earnings and with prodigious cash flow enabling it simultaneously to keep up its pace of small acquisitions while still repurchasing shares, the market may soon realize that its diagnosis of J&J was overly dire,” Lex says.
- Are Goldman shares worth a flier at current levels? James Stewart weighs in.

