The Reflation Gambit

Posted by Paul Vigna on April 30, 2010
Economic Indicators, Economy, GDP, Markets, Recession, Retail Sales, Unemployment
Bananas!

Bananas!

Let’s see if we can find a common string in today’s data.

Gross domestic product in the first quarter rose at a 3.2% annual rate, “driven by businesses stocking up on goods for a strengthening consumer demand stoked by the lowest core inflation number in 51 years.” The “core” inflation rate, excluding food and energy, rose 0.6% in the first quarter, a big drop from 1.8% in the fourth.

That was the lowest reading since 1959, back in the Elvis and Sputnik days. Oh, let’s twist again, like we did last summer.

Let me ask you this: how strong can consumer demand possibly be if inflation is downright disinflationary? We’ve seen the Fed pump more money into the system than at any time in its history, and yet inflation keeps slipping. That’s simply because consumers aren’t spending more money.

Inflation is driven by the velocity of money, basically how rapidly a dollar passes from one person to another to another. If people aren’t spending money, you won’t get inflation. Which is why despite the Fed’s ZIRP rates policy, despite the nearly $2 trillion cash injection, there’s no sign of inflation. People aren’t spending. Don’t get me wrong. People are spending some money — I’ve got to buy a Communion present this weekend, and I need some new work shirts, and we got pizza last night — but they’re not spending enough to drive even “normal” inflation, forget some kind of inflation the Fed would actually, like, have to worry about.

So you tell me where this big recovery’s coming from.

Yes, there’s been a much ballyhooed revival of spending, we even did some of the ballyhooing, but keep two things in mind: a lot of it’s coming from government stimulus. People aren’t maxing out their credit cards anymore, or using their homes as the proverbial ATM. Primarily because they are still digging out from under the credit implosion, and will be for quite some time to come.

That’s why the feds and the Fed are trying so hard to reflate the economy, because it is positively deflating, still, and our elected and appointed leaders have absolutely no idea how to structure the economy any other way. And I feel for them, too. Because spending borrowed money has sadly become a major crutch in this nation over the past generation or two. But the crutch itself is defective.

Businesses gearing up for a big surge in consumer spending, I fear, may be disappointed. Although I can’t say I’ve seen a single company reporting earnings that’s come out and said, we’re gearing up for a big recovery. They’re all very tentative. The only people pushing the recovery meme hard are Democrats and Wall Street. And Larry Kudlow.

But hey, here’s one bright note to the disinflationary trend: in the first quarter, wages almost managed to keep up with inflation. Wages rose 0.4%, the Labor Department reported separately this morning. Benefits were up a brisk 1.1%, bringing the cost index up to 0.6%. That 0.4% number is just a hair below the 0.6% core inflation rate. So congratulations, America, you just barely fell behind this quarter. Feel richer? Feel like taking on some fresh debt all of a sudden?

Oh, deflation, do…that voodoo…that you do…so well…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Comments to The Reflation Gambit

Chris
April 30, 2010

I would also point out that consumer spending is probably be bolstered by housing “squatters” not paying their mortgage. An extra $1,000-$3,000 per month in mortgage savings and not paying rent goes a long way these days. Of course this is illusory until the banks finally foreclose but in the meantime, the consumer has some extra cash in their pocket.

Beverly
April 30, 2010

THERE IS NO RECOVERY. Only a phony stock market rally from which everything flows. Joe Sixpack isn’t aware of the ‘Great Manipulation’ happening in the stock market. He only sees that his 401k has rebounded nicely and figures good times are back.

What happens when all of these people who’ve been coaxed into charging on their credit cards again all go to take money out of their investment accounts and pay their bills at the same time? It won’t bode well for a stock market that’s been inched higher on no volume via program trading and manipulated futures in the after hours.

Raymond Haines
April 30, 2010

As I have repeated a number of times on this site, the stock market’s original rally was based off of the implied dividend return of the S+P. With a ZIRP policy, a 3 percent implied return for the S+P took a lot of money off the sidelines. For the economy, I agree we will need to see if it can stand on it’s own two legs without government stimulus. Unfortunately, a large percentage of our economy is directly related to the health of our housing industry and we all know housing still has a lot of problems. One question for you Paul. I always thought inflation was caused when too many dollars are chasing too few goods, not velocity.
Could you comment on that ?

Paul Vigna
April 30, 2010

I think effectively they’re the same thing. I get a raise for all my good work here, and feel very good about myself and wealthy and rich and all that. So I go out and buy a new golf club at your sporting goods store (I don’t even golf, it’s just the first thing came into my head.) So the dollar goes from me to you. Say a lot of other people got raises for their good work, and felt as good as I did. They’d also buy new clubs.

You’ve suddenly got all this new business, and you’re feeling good about yourself, too, so you take the wife to a Broadway play. Maybe Phantom. Or Enron.

Etcetera and etcetera. The velocity of that money changing hands increases. Eventually, you have too much money chasing too few goods. We’re talking about the same thing.

On the other hand, if my wages aren’t growing, I’m not feeling very rich, so I just stick with my old clubs. I don’t spend money in your store, neither does anybody else. So you don’t take your wife to see Phantom. That process eventually grinds down economic growth.

We don’t have wage growth right now, so the government’s trying to replace it by basically just giving people money. It’s a swap of one fuel for another. It’s called stimulus, but it’s basically just giving people money and hoping they spend it, sparking the velocity of money, and getting the motor going again.

It’s a gambit. I personally don’t believe it ever works, but that’s just me.