The Pinocchio Recovery

Posted by Paul Vigna on September 22, 2009
Autos, Dow Jones Industrials, Economy, Federal Reserve, Markets, Stimulus, Washington

pinocchioIs it me?

I just can’t help but feel that there’s something the stock market’s missing about the economy. It’s a feeling I had back in 2007 as well. The market was marching giddily higher, right into October, and the whole time, I’m thinking to myself, there’s something wrong here. You didn’t need to know about derivatives, securitized debt, CDOs, CDS or mortgage fraud. Home prices had doubled in five years, wages were flat. It was the very picture of an asset bubble.

Now, I see a recovery that looks like Pinocchio: it wants to be a real little boy, but it’s really just a wooden toy that moves only when somebody pulls its strings. But everywhere, we hear people talking up the recovery as if the economy is sprinting into a new bull market.

Listen, I’m no PhD. I’m willing to entertain the idea that I could be wrong. There are a lot of smart people who probably think I’m wrong. Of course, there were a lot of people much smarter than me who were wrong in 2007.

But I keep seeing all those strings pulling the economy, and wonder if and when they can be cut.

For one thing, the stimulus programs that have come out of the federal government and Federal Reserve have underwritten the recovery. These include cash-for-clunkers, the first-time home-buyer tax credit, the Fed’s facilities for buying Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities, as well as its move to lower its federal funds rate to essentially zero.

Cash-for-clunkers provided a spike to auto sales, but the program has already expired, and the auto sales are already falling back to the levels from before the program. If the rest of the stimulus programs have a similar temporary effect, the economy may be stuck in its current state for some time.

Then there’s inventory replenishment. This is one of the biggest props of the recovery theory. Companies have been slashing inventory levels, and the notion is that once they begin restocking the shelves, it will provide a big boost to activity.

pinocchio2Through August, at least, this process had not started. Inventories were still falling, the Census Bureau reported. If September doesn’t exhibit some rebuilding, this plank will start popping some serious holes. For one thing, now is the time when companies start stocking up for the holiday season, which apparently lasts longer than actual seasons like winter (indeed, K-Mart and Target are already selling Christmas merchandise.) So we should already be seeing some inventory building. Shouldn’t we?

I can see this rally running through October, because the Fed is still underwriting the stock market, through the bond-buying programs, and money managers are still chasing returns, and likely will through their October fiscal years end. The Fed will still be buying MBS through year-end, but winding it down.

Washington’s hope is that the stimulus will eventually give way to a natural momentum that will pull the economy out of recession (and no matter what the President or Fed Chairman or anybody says, right now at least, we are officially still in a recession.)

But if that momentum doesn’t build on its own, if those props disappear, and at the same time holiday sales come in weak, well, that could spell trouble. Another thing to keep an eye on, of course, will be corporate profits. They should start looking better given easy comparisons to last year, but the market is building in a lot of upside there.

But maybe it’s just me.

(Images: Andre Koehne, wikipedia commons)

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

27 Comments to The Pinocchio Recovery

[...] some reading for your afternoon pleasure: • The Pinocchio Recovery (Market [...]

Chocko
September 22, 2009

The stock market usually isn’t about the real state of the economy.

dean jackson
September 22, 2009

Basically agree. However, the level of inventory is not the issue so much as the ratio of inventory to sales also published by Census. It has been coming down although not yet to pre-recession levels. And if we are importing everything from underwear to IPods, I not sure how restocking boost the economy. Having said that, imports are slow. This website does a nice job of showing what is coming through the ports of LA and Long Beach. It is back to 2003 levels for imports.
http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/search/label/Trade%20Deficit

PaulDoubter
September 22, 2009

Well, Paul, what’s your track record with past predictions?

How is your money invested?

Did you miss this massive rally the past six months?

Readers should get your answers to these questions before heeding your predictions.

Paul Vigna
September 22, 2009

Well, PaulDoubter (and great handle, by the way), not that it’s anybody’s business, but I’ll tell you up front, yes indeed, I missed this rally. All of it.

Now, as somebody who covers the market, professionally I can’t dabble in it, so my only stock holdings were in my 401(K).

In September 2007, I got out of all my stock funds and put everything into bonds.

In other words, I didn’t lose a dime. Not a penny. My 401(K) has actually appreciated modestly since then.

Now, I’m just a reporter, I don’t get paid to make predictions or manage people’s money, but I’ll put that up against absolutely any fund manager’s track record through the recession.

How’d you do?

Tim
September 22, 2009

PV – Most of us appreciate your thoughts/opinion as another data point in a vast sea of bloggers.

Don’t mind the haters.

Jay
September 22, 2009

“no matter what the President or Fed Chairman or anybody says, right now at least, we are officially still in a recession.”

I think this is incorrect. The correct way to say this is, perhaps: “no matter what the President or Fed Chairman or anybody says, right now at least, we are not officially in a recovery”.

It’s not the case that we are “officially in a recession until the NBER says otherwise”. The NBER doesn’t make this determination until the recession has “officially” been over for a long time. Once they make this determination there will have been a prolonged period where *we were not in a recession* but *it was not yet official that this was the case*.

Perhaps a subtle distinction, but one worth making, IMO.

[...] some reading for your afternoon pleasure: • The Pinocchio Recovery (Market [...]

Carlo
September 22, 2009

No Phd here. I did not need it 2 years ago when I foresaw something like this could happen.

25+ years US “growing” on credit, about 370% more credit per capita.
10 year net job creation is negative.
10 year increase on income per capita just about 5-7%.

“Jobless recovery” = Kick the can by borrowing just like we have done in past recessions.

US has too much excess capacity created by false demmand due careless borrowing and economic “strategy.”

The question is not if the economy is going to crack and fall, the question is whether it’s going to happen on this cycle or if they re-inflate another bubble so it collapses the next.

PD Another bubble would be nice so the market keep rallying, hope they extend the stimulus so we go higher, for now.

ken arnold
September 23, 2009

The Census bureau does not track inventories of manufactured goods or report on them. The author probably meant the Commerce Dept…

B Smith
September 23, 2009

It is nice to read some real correct thoughts, yes the market dose not really go with reality but there in lies some of the trouble! There will not be anything in the real economy for a long time folks and the feds and all the rest of the optimists should really look harder.

[...] I think Paul Vigna did a good jo&#98&#32&#115ummarizing my feelings by labeling this a “Pinocchio Recovery:” [...]

ETF FOOL
September 23, 2009

[...] some reading for your afternoon pleasure: • The Pinocchio Recovery (Market [...]

Paul Vigna
September 23, 2009

First off, I want to thank you all for taking the time to post your thoughts, even you, PaulDoubter. We’re trying to build this blog up and it’s great to know you’re all reading. And there are two points I wanted to reply to specifically.

Jay, it’s a good point, and I thought about the language to use there before writing what I did. Here’s why I used those words: yes, the NBER waits until well after the recession is over to declare it so. But the reason why they do it is because they want to be completely sure that the recession actually is over. If there’s a recession, then a few months of growth, then a slide back, well, then the recession never actually ended.

Now, most people think the recession ended around July. That’s only two months ago, far too early to declare for sure that the recession is over. So, officially, we are still in a recession. Let’s hope for all our sakes it ends soon, but right now nobody can say for sure that it has. Time will tell.

Ken, Census does report inventories: http://www.census.gov/mtis/www/mtis_current.html

But they’re part of the Commerce Department, so we’re both right.

Y’all come back now, ya hear?

hazeleyes
September 23, 2009

I’m seeing/hearing lots of sound and fury about recovery but not seeing it in my town. Things look bleaker every day, gauged by more empty commercial and residential real estate, business closings, losses of jobs, and interestingly, far far less traffic on the roads. It’s a very odd sensation to be the only driver on formerly-traffic-clogged streets and roads. This has been going on for months, looks like it’ll continue.

If social sentiment is what drives economic growth, I don’t think the recession has ended nor will end anytime soon.

Watch those Christmas sales…oops, I forgot, they’re over!

hazeleyes
September 23, 2009

Fed Growth Effort May Be Undermined by ‘Tight’ Credit (Update2)

By Scott Lanman
Sept. 22 (Bloomberg) — Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s efforts to stoke a U.S. economic recovery may be undermined by the central bank’s other goal of restoring the banking system to health.

The Federal Open Market Committee, at the conclusion tomorrow of a two-day meeting, will probably maintain its assessment that “tight” bank credit is impeding growth, said economists including former Fed Governor Lyle Gramley. Lending contracted for five straight weeks through Sept. 9, a drop that in part reflects Fed orders to banks to raise more capital and toughen lending standards, analysts say.

A failure to restore the flow of bank credit carries the risk that the economic recovery will be slower than the Fed anticipates, or even that the U.S. lapses into another recession, economists say. That would make it more likely the Fed will keep its main interest rate close to zero for a longer period.

“They would be absolutely delighted if banks went out and raised a lot more private capital and then began to lend more,” said Gramley, now senior economic adviser with New York-based Soleil Securities Corp. “Until that happens, the Fed has to continue to try to encourage economic growth through easy money.”

The FOMC, composed of Bernanke, Fed governors and regional Fed-bank presidents, started meeting at 2 p.m. and is expected to release a statement tomorrow at about 2:15 p.m. New York time. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News unanimously forecast the Fed will leave its benchmark interest rate unchanged.

Extend End Date

The central bank may also decide to extend the end date of its $1.45 trillion program to buy housing debt, now set to expire at the end of the year, and to gradually reduce the size of the purchases.

Banks have become more careful about lending. A Fed report released last week shows banks had $6.85 trillion of loans and leases outstanding to businesses and households as of Sept. 9, down for a fifth straight week and below the record $7.32 trillion in October 2008. Real estate loans, the biggest portion, stood at $3.79 trillion, up $7.5 billion from the prior week while down from a peak of $3.9 trillion.

The Fed’s second-quarter survey of senior loan officers, released Aug. 17, showed U.S. banks tightened standards on all types of loans and said they expect to maintain strict criteria on lending until at least the second half of 2010.

‘Worthy Households’

“While it is important for economic recovery that lenders provide credit to worthy households and businesses, they also must maintain enough capital to withstand losses — even if economic conditions turn out to be worse than anticipated,” San Francisco Fed President Janet Yellen said in a Sept. 14 speech.

“The financial system is still far from healthy and tight credit is likely to put a damper on growth for some time to come,” Yellen continued.

Fed-led stress tests of the 19 biggest U.S. banks earlier this year were designed to ensure that the firms had enough capital to withstand a more severe economic downturn. The tests found that the banks need to raise $75 billion to withstand potential losses.

Separately, regional and some smaller U.S. banks may need $12 billion to $14 billion in additional capital to cope with troubled loans still on their books, the Congressional Oversight Panel said in August.

Banks have a Nov. 9 deadline from the Fed to raise the amount of capital determined by the stress tests. Bernanke said in June that the 10 firms that required capital had raised or announced actions to generate $48 billion of new common equity. The firms included Bank of America Corp., Wells Fargo & Co. and GMAC LLC.

Mortgage Rules

The Fed has taken other steps to make sure banks avoid riskier loans. In July 2008, it tightened mortgage rules by requiring lenders to determine a borrower’s ability to repay and barring other practices that led to the collapse of the housing market.

Minimum regulatory-capital requirements may change as officials in the U.S. and abroad craft new financial rules. Consumers are less credit-worthy as the job market deteriorates and after a record loss of wealth from plunging share prices and real estate values.

Rising unemployment will slow the pace of the recovery, Bernanke said on Sept. 15.

‘Very Weak’

“Even though from a technical perspective the recession is very likely over at this point, it’s still going to feel like a very weak economy for some time,” Bernanke said in response to a question after a speech in Washington. Fed officials in June predicted that GDP will expand 2.1 percent to 3.3 percent next year after shrinking 1.5 percent to 1 percent this year, according to the central tendency of their forecasts.

Banks have plenty of reasons to hold back on lending, analysts say.

Americans fell behind on their mortgage payments at a record pace in the second quarter, with delinquencies rising to 9.24 percent, according to an August report by the Mortgage Bankers Association.

“Consumers aren’t necessarily that creditworthy a proposition right now,” said John Ryding, chief economist and founder of RDQ Economics LLC in New York.

Falling values of commercial real estate are also a problem for banks, with an “uncertain degree of losses” to come, said Ryding, a former Fed researcher. Loans made for commercial property will probably sour and lenders will need to raise more capital to cover credit losses, Mike Mayo, a banking analyst at CLSA Ltd., said today at a conference in Hong Kong.

‘Ratchet Back’

“Banks are all trying to ratchet back their credit exposure,” said Eric Hovde, chief executive officer of Hovde Capital Advisors LLC, who manages about $1 billion with a concentration in financial and real-estate related companies and is chairman of Sunwest Bank in Tustin, California.

For instance, JPMorgan Chase & Co. now requires mortgage borrowers to make bigger down payments than before the crisis, and it has stopped allowing so-called stated-income loans that don’t require documentation of earnings, said Tom Kelly, a spokesman.

Neal Soss, chief economist at Credit Suisse in New York, predicts the lending lull will end within a few months after businesses finish depleting inventories and financial firms better determine how much in capital governments will require them to have.

“Bank lending is going to pick up all by itself as banks go looking for ways to add more juice to their earnings profile,” said Soss, who used to work as an aide to former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker. Soss said he forecasts 3.5 percent economic growth in 2010, on the high end of analyst projections.

Index Rallies

The 24-company KBW Bank Index rallied 69 percent from March 31 through yesterday as concern faded that lenders might not survive the economic slump.

Even as banks hold back, Fed policy makers have been trying to encourage borrowing to stoke an economic recovery. The Fed and other U.S. regulators told banks in November to maintain lending to “creditworthy” borrowers while warning against paying dividends that would cut funds available for loans.

In March, the Fed started an emergency program, the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, to restart the loan- securitization markets that help form the so-called “shadow banking” system. That has helped generate investor demand for debt tied to auto and credit-card loans, unfreezing part of the credit markets.

“The question for the Fed, which is a very difficult question, is: what is the appropriate level of bank lending?” said Joseph Mason, a Louisiana State University banking professor and former economist at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. “It’s not bubble lending, it’s some subset of that. That is where the art of central banking lies.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Scott Lanman in Washington at slanman@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: September 22, 2009 14:34 EDT
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a5N42asUN1x4

[...] “The Pinocchio Recovery”, Paul Vigna, Dow Jones Market Talk Posted by Greg Feirman  ·  Trackback URL [...]

[...] the original: Market Talk » Blog Archive » The Pinocchio Recovery google_ad_client = “pub-3658190228035086″; google_ad_slot = “1112917537″; google_ad_width = [...]

[...] the rest here: Market Talk » Blog Archive » The Pinocchio Recovery No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: “Market Talk » [...]

AlphaDog
September 23, 2009

Clearly psychology has trumped fundamentals for the time being. My prediction is that this economy and correspondingly the S&P are more akin to droping a rubber ball down a flight of stairs…it may bounce higher than the previous level in the short term, but at the end f the trip the ball will be laying at the base of the stairs. I saw a stat recently that hailed the consumer as healthy because the total debt at the consumer level had declined by almost 10%. The article went so far as to suggest that after “paying down” debt by nearly 10% in less than 15 months – the consumer would actually be able to support a higher level of spending than before the economic bust! I of course sent the author an email letting him know that the consumer did not “pay down” debt by 10% – the foreclosure and forgiveness of other debt wiped out the consumer and the party owed at the same time. i.e. neither was in a position to support the economy going forward.

I’m sure a public health care option will help…

doctorbiml
September 23, 2009

Amazing news, thank you!

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mark Phillips, b pfeifer, Ken Kaizen, Ken Kaizen and others. Ken Kaizen said: The Pinocchio recovery http://j.mp/od3UN [...]

ETF FOOL
September 24, 2009

[...] The Pinocchio Recovery [...]

[...] But from where I sit, this much ballyhooed recovery is still, still, nothing more than the Pinocchio doll I said it was last fall, whose strings are being pulled by Uncle Sam and the Fed. It’s not a real little [...]

james bond
December 15, 2010

join the discussion. talk to other about your positions. help people and get help from people. everything is explained here. http://onceinalifetimemarketpicks.blogspot.com/

[...] wrote back in September 2009 about the Pinocchio recovery: “I see a recovery that looks like Pinocchio: it wants to be a real little boy, but it’s [...]